Personal tools
Disability Rights Connection

Disability Rights Oregon is seeking volunteer attorneys to increase its ability to help Oregon’s children with disabilities who are not receiving adequate special education services. Volunteer attorneys will assist students whose situations can be appropriately addressed with straightforward written complaints, limited to clear violations of Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA). DRO’s Special Education Advocacy Program has been designed so that participating volunteer attorneys will be able to do valuable and needed work with a high degree of control over how that work impacts their own schedules and practice demands. ...more

Attend this free CLE to learn more about special education advocacy and DRO's new Special Education Volunteer Attorney program. This free CLE will be hosted by Smith Freed and Eberhard P.C. on April 18, 2013. The CLE presentation will be 3pm-4:30pm. It will be followed by a meet and greet from 4:30pm-5:30pm with hors d'oeuvres and beverages provided. 1.5 CLE credits pending. Register by April 11. Registration is limited to 50 attendees. ...more

This week's legislative update addresses mental health service dogs for veterans, family law, the state disabilities act, restraint and seclusion in schools, and mental health crisis services, abuse protection and funding. ...more

DRO is looking into whether for-profit vocational schools are targeting individuals with intellectual disabilities. ...more

Donate Now

Make a Donation to Support DRO's Work

Our ability to advocate for individuals and to bring about long-term improvements depends on support from people who care about disability rights.
 

Lane v. Kitzhaber Certified as a Class Action

On August 6, 2012, Judge Janice Stewart certified Lane v. Kitzhaber, the supported employment case brought by DRO, as a class action. While the original case was filed with eight named individuals and United Cerebral Palsy of Washington/Oregon, the judge's order means that the lawsuit now covers “all individuals in Oregon with intellectual or developmental disabilities who are in, or who have been referred to, sheltered workshops” and “who are qualified for supported employment services.”

The court found that it was appropriate to have this case treated as a class action because the actions complained of could be be resolved “in one stroke” with an appropriate injunction applicable to all class members.

As outlined in the complaint, the plaintiffs seek an order that would require the defendants to “administer, fund and operate its employment services system in a manner that does not relegate persons with [I/DD] to segregated workshops and which includes supported employment services that allow persons with disabilities the opportunity to work in integrated settings.”

That does not mean that defendants must provide a community job to every qualified individual who wants one, but only that it must “provide supported employment services to all qualified class members, consistent with their individual needs.”

The case will now proceed through the discovery process -- and the experience of every class member in seeking supported employment is part of the evidence in this case.

Because a class has now been certified, any settlement that is reached in the case will affect everyone in Oregon who is a class member -- and any settlement must be reviewed by the court and can only be implemented if the court finds that it is a fair and adequate resolution of the issues in the case.

Document Actions
  • < a href="" tal:attributes="href daction/url; title daction/description"> < img tal:attributes="alt daction/title; title daction/title; src daction/icon;" /> < /a>
  • < a href="" tal:attributes="href daction/url; title daction/description"> < img tal:attributes="alt daction/title; title daction/title; src daction/icon;" /> < /a>